Search for: "EDWARDS v. A C AND S INC et al" Results 1 - 20 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 9:59 am by Kang Haggerty LLC
Philadelphia, PA (November 1, 2023): A jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Shin Da Enterprises, Inc., et al, v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Edwards Community, Inc. et al , an 11-page opinion, Judge Mathias writes:The Town of Georgetown ("the Town") appeals the order of the Floyd Circuit Court imposing a moratorium on future attempts by the Town to annex certain territories and awarding attorney fees to Edwardsville Community, Inc. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 10:49 am
Arellano, et al. , a 17-page opinion involving a land sales contract, Senior Judge Barteau writes:Pramco challenges two of the trial court's findings and one of the trial court's conclusions of law, more specifically: 1. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:30 am by WSLL
Vic and Jane Garber, et al. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Anticipation/Obviousness: Google Inc., et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Sony Music Entertainment, et al., No. 15-1518 (Claim construction in IPRs – pro se case) Interference: Edward Tobinick v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm by Law Lady
THE CITY OF HOMESTEAD, et al., Appellees. 3rd District.Child support -- Paternity testing -- It was a departure from the essential requirements of law to require parties to submit to paternity testing in a proceeding to establish child support obligation where father did not place child's paternity in controversy and good cause for paternity testing was not establishedFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE by and on behalf of CIARA GAIL CORBITT, Petitioner, v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Duerr & Co. et al., 184 F. 893 (2d Cir. 1911). -- If you are wondering, C. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, et al., No. 16-712 1. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
Sony Music Entertainment, et al., No. 15-1518 (Claim construction in IPRs – pro se case) Interference: Edward Tobinick v. [read post]